Received: from e55.webcom.com (e55.webcom.com [206.2.192.66]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.5/8.7.5-MZ) with ESMTP id VAA08765 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Sat, 13 Apr 1996 21:58:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost by e55.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA010436933; Sat, 13 Apr 1996 18:55:33 -0700
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 18:55:33 -0700
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <3170541B.4C02@net1.net>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: "thROB (Robert Nederhorst" <throb@Net1.Net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: OpenGL card: Matronix and OpenGL in LW 5.0
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
Adam Ives Chrystie wrote:
> I do not think i was talking to myself. People have said that the
> Matronix actually is not that good for 3d accelerated applications
> compared to what is going to be comming out. As a result, I know i am
> gonna wait to see what is released.
>
> It seems that the matronix didn't meet he expectations of people on other
> 3d applications...sooo why would it for lightwave 5.0 ..that is the point
> Erik..
>
1)The name of the co. is MATROX.
2)you have to understand that the millennium is a CONSUMER based board. True, it's not the 360k
tesxtured poly per second, but it's not $2k either. It's $300!!! Not bad for a board that does
support openGL and is just durned fast in Windows95/NT for image editing.
